Utilization of coronary computed tomography angiography and computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in a critical limb-threatening ischemia cohort.

Objective: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) have a significant risk of myocardial infarction and death secondary to concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). This is particularly true in patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) who exceed a 20% mortality rate at 6 months despite standard treatment with risk factor modification. Although systematic preoperative coronary testing is not recommended for patients with PAD without cardiac symptoms, the clinical manifestations of CAD are often muted in patients with CLTI due to poor mobility and activity intolerance. Thus, the true incidence and impact of "silent" CAD in a CLTI cohort is unknown. This study aims to determine the prevalence of ischemia-producing coronary artery stenosis in a CLTI cohort using coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT), a noninvasive imaging modality that has shown significant correlation to cardiac catheterization in the detection of clinically relevant coronary ischemia. Methods: Patients presenting with newly diagnosed CLTI at our institution from May 2020 to April 2021 were screened for underlying CAD. Included subjects had no known history of CAD, no cardiac symptoms, and no anginal equivalent complaints at presentation. Patients underwent cCTA and FFRCT evaluation and were classified by the anatomic location and severity of CAD. Significant coronary ischemia was defined as FFRCT ≤0.80 distal to a >30% coronary stenosis, and severe coronary ischemia was documented at FFRCT ≤0.75, consistent with established guidelines. Results: A total of 170 patients with CLTI were screened; 65 patients (38.2%) had no coronary symptoms and met all inclusion/exclusion criteria. Twenty-four patients (31.2%) completed cCTA and FFRCT evaluation. Forty-one patients have yet to complete testing secondary to socioeconomic factors (insurance denial, transportation inaccessibility, testing availability, etc). The mean age of included subjects was 65.4 ± 7.0 years, and 15 (62.5%) were male. Patients presented with ischemic rest pain (n = 7; 29.1%), minor tissue loss (n = 14; 58.3%) or major tissue loss (n = 3; 12.5%). Significant (≥50%) coronary artery stenosis was noted on cCTA in 19 of 24 patients (79%). Significant left main coronary artery stenosis was identified in two patients (10%). When analyzed with FFRCT, 17 patients (71%) had hemodynamically significant coronary ischemia (FFRCT ≤0.8), and 54% (n = 13) had lesion-specific severe coronary ischemia (FFRCT ≤0.75). The mean FFRCT in patients with coronary ischemia was 0.70 ± 0.07. Multi-vessel disease pattern was present in 53% (n = 9) of patients with significant coronary stenosis. Conclusions: The use of cCTA-derived fractional flow reserve demonstrates a significant percentage of patients with CLTI have silent (asymptomatic) coronary ischemia. More than one-half of these patients have lesion-specific severe ischemia, which may be associated with increased mortality when treated solely with risk factor modification. cCTA and FFRCT diagnosis of significant coronary ischemia has the potential to improve cardiac care, perioperative morbidity, and long-term survival curves of patients with CLTI. Systemic improvements in access to care will be needed to allow for broad application of these imaging assessments should they prove universally valuable. Additional study is required to determine the benefit of selective coronary revascularization in patients with CLTI.

Disparities in Outcomes Between Sexes in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Treated with TEVAR.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate differences in presentation and outcomes between sexes in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS: Between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2017 186 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for TBAD at a single institution. Men (n = 112) and women (n = 74) were compared based on presenting demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention. RESULTS: Women were older (P = 0.04) and had a lower body mass index (P = 0.03). More women (F) presented with continued pain or refractory hypertension (51.0% F, 30.0% M), while more men (M) presented with acute complicated dissections (19.0% F, 39.0% M) (P = 0.008). At presentation, women had statistically higher relative rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.05), hyperlipidemia (P = 0.03), and smoking (P = 0.03). Significantly more women were on Medicare without Medicaid (55.0% F, 34.0% M), while men had private insurance (35.0% F, 13.0% M) (P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in blood pressure control at presentation, discharge, or at 30 days. When normalized by body surface area, women had larger ascending aortic diameters (19.2(3.10)F, 17.5(2.40)M, P = 0.0002), as well as proportionally larger true lumens at the left subclavian artery (14.9(2.90)F, 13.4(2.50)M, P = 0.0002), carina (12.6(5.80)F, 9.90(4.80)M, P = 0.0009), and celiac (10.5(4.50)F, 8.50(4.10)M, P = 0.006) levels, and at the largest point of dissection (11.6(6.50)F, 9.60(4.80)M, P = 0.04), as well as proportionately smaller false lumens at the carina (5.90(5.60)F, 9.30(6.10)M, P = 0.003). Despite not being statistically significant, women had lower rates of stroke (6.80% F, 8.00% M, P = 0.7) and acute kidney injury (5.40% F, 11.6% M, P = 0.2), as well fewer days in the intensive care unit (ICU) (3.20(4.30)F, 4.60(6.60)M, P = 0.2) and an overall shorter length of stay (6.80(6.70)F, 8.00(8.20)M, P = 0.5). Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival for women versus men were 96.0% vs. 92.0%, 90.0% vs. 79.0%, and 70.0% vs. 69.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.042). Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from reintervention for women versus men were 89.0% vs. 90.0%, 58.0% vs. 72.0%, and 48.0% vs. 58.0% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Women present with TBAD at an older age, have more comorbidities, lower socioeconomic status, and have larger ascending aortic diameters for their size. Despite having less severe dissections as evidenced by smaller false lumens and wider true lumens, it does not appear that this correlates with improved outcomes for women when compared to men. It appears that this is one of the few, if not only, aortic pathologies that result in comparable outcomes between sexes.

Cocaine use is associated with worse outcomes in patients treated with thoracic endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the clinical and anatomical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without known cocaine use who underwent thoracic endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections. METHODS: Between January 2012 and January 2017, 186 patients underwent thoracic endovascular repair for type B aortic dissection at our institution. Clinical data and anatomical characteristics were collected under an institutional review board-approved protocol. Survival, reintervention, complications, and characteristics of dissection were compared between patients with cocaine use (C+; n = 14) and those with no known cocaine use (C-; n = 172). RESULTS: Cocaine users were more likely to be young African American males who smoked. They tended to present with more extensive dissections as evidenced by larger false lumen diameters. They also had higher rates of endoleaks and more reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that special care should be taken to provide close follow-up for these patients.

Retrograde type A dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical, anatomic, and procedural characteristics of patients who developed retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS: Between January 2012 and January 2017, there were 186 patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD at a multidisciplinary aortic center. Patients who developed RTAD after TEVAR (n = 15) were compared with those who did not (no-RTAD group, n = 171). Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention. RESULTS: The incidence of RTAD in our sample was 8% (n = 15). Kaplan-Meier estimates found that no-RTAD patients had better survival (P = .04). Survival rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years were 93%, 60%, and 60% for RTAD patients and 94%, 87%, and 80% for no-RTAD patients. One RTAD was diagnosed intraoperatively, 5 were diagnosed within 30 days of the index procedure, 6 were diagnosed within 1 year, and 3 were diagnosed after 1 year. Reintervention for RTAD was undertaken in 10 of 15 patients, with a 50% survival rate after reintervention. Partial or complete false lumen thrombosis was more frequently present in RTAD patients (P = .03). RTAD patients more frequently presented with renal ischemia (P = .04). Most RTAD patients (93%, RTAD patients; 64%, no-RTAD patients; P = .02) had a proximal landing zone in zone 0, 1, or 2. Aortic diameter was more frequently ≥40 mm in the RTAD group (47%, RTAD patients; 21%, no-RTAD patients; P = .05). Patients with RTAD had stent grafts placed in the renovisceral arteries for complicated dissections, and this approached significance (P = .05). Three RTAD patients had a type II arch (20%) compared with 53 no-RTAD patients (31%; P = .6), but a comparison of type II arch with type I or type III found no statistical significance (P = .6). No correlations were found between ratio of descending to ascending diameters, average aortic sizing, graft size, or bare-metal struts at proximal attachment zone and development of RTAD. We found no statistically significant differences in demographics, genetic disease, comorbidities, or previous repairs. CONCLUSIONS: The development of RTAD after TEVAR for TBAD does not appear to be correlated with any easily identifiable demographic feature but appears to be correlated with proximal landing zones in zone 1 and 2 and an ascending diameter >4 cm. Furthermore, the presence of partial or complete false lumen thrombosis as well as more complicated presentation with renal ischemia was significantly more frequent in patients with RTAD. TBAD patients should be observed long term, as type A dissections in our patients occurred even after 1 year.

Short-term and midterm survival of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the contemporary endovascular era.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been shown to reduce mortality in the emergent repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). However, long-term survival data for this group of patients are lacking with contemporary endovascular endografts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both 30-day mortality rates and 1-year survival in patients undergoing emergent EVAR in a 43-facility hospital system with a quaternary referral center with an established ruptured aneurysm protocol. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients captured prospectively in an Institutional Review Board-approved registry for patients treated emergently for AAA were reviewed between 2012 and 2017 was conducted. Primary outcome measures were 30-day mortality and 1-year survival for the entire group as well as for symptomatic and ruptured aneurysms. Data were analyzed using logistic regression survival curves, and a log-rank test was performed to compare survival between open and endovascular repair. Patients were evaluated on an intent-to-treat basis, and outcomes were evaluated in a multivariate model. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients were referred as part of the protocol. Of these, 102 (41%) were treated emergently. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 30-day and 1-year survival were 64% and 53% for all patients, 58% and 46% for ruptured patients, and 86% and 81% for symptomatic patients. EVAR resulted in improved 30-day survival (64% vs 31%; odds ratio, 4.0; P = .03) and 1-year survival (40% vs 23%; odds ratio, 2.3; P = .4) over open repair. Significant predictors for 30-day mortality included hypotension (P = .0003), blood transfusion (P < .0001), length of stay (P = .0005), extravasation (P = .01), preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P = .04), open repair (P = .007), aortouni-iliac reconstruction (P = .008), and abdominal compartment syndrome (P = .007). Significant predictors for 1-year mortality included advanced age (P = .04), hypotension (P = .01), blood transfusion (P = .006), extravasation (P = .03), reintubation (P = .03), and abdominal compartment syndrome (P = .03). There were no differences in outcomes based on race, gender, or outside transfer. Peripheral arterial disease (P = .04), hypertension (P = .04), coronary artery disease (P = .03), and familial history of aneurysms (P = .05) were related to increased 30-day mortality. Peripheral arterial disease (P = .06) and coronary artery disease (P = .07) were nearly significant, with increased 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR is associated with improved survival compared with open repair in patients requiring emergent AAA repair. However, in the first year, there is a significant risk of death based on initial presentation as well as underlying comorbidities. To improve long-term survival, aggressive medical management and medical surveillance are warranted.

Ethnic disparities in outcomes of patients with complicated type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in outcomes after endovascular intervention in patients with complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) based on ethnicity and blood pressure control. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2016, there were 126 patients who underwent endovascular procedures for complicated TBAD at a single-institution quaternary referral center. Patients self-identified as African American (n = 53), white (n = 70), and Asian (n = 3). African American and white patients were compared on a number of variables, including age, ethnicity, insurance type, blood pressure, comorbidities, number of previous interventions, and number of antihypertension medications they were taking before intervention. Primary outcomes were survival and need for reintervention. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival for African Americans vs whites were 94% vs 89%, 91% vs 83%, 89% vs 79%, and 89% vs 76% at 30 days, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively (P = .05). African Americans were younger overall (52.5 ± 11 years) vs whites (63.7 ± 14.7 years; P < .0001). African Americans required a significantly greater number of reinterventions (P = .007). They also had higher rates of chronic kidney disease (P = .01), smoking (P = .03), and cocaine use (P = .02) and were more likely to be on Medicaid (P = .02). Hypertension was poorly controlled in both groups, with the percentage of patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >140 mm Hg) preoperatively, postoperatively, and 30 days after intervention at 32%, 32%, and 39%. There was no significant difference between the cohorts in uncontrolled hypertension preoperatively (P = .39) or postoperatively (P = .63). However, more African Americans had uncontrolled hypertension at 30 days (African Americans, 49%; whites, 31%; odds ratio, 2.1; P = .09). African Americans were taking a greater number of antihypertension medications at presentation than whites (P = .01) and specifically had higher use rates of beta blockers (P = .02), diuretics (P = .02), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: African Americans with TBAD present at a younger age than their white counterparts do and have a survival advantage up to at least 5 years. However, African Americans have a higher rate of reintervention that is probably associated with poor blood pressure control despite taking more antihypertension medications both before and after the repair. It appears that optimal medical therapy is difficult to achieve in all groups. More aggressive medical management is needed, particularly more so in African Americans, which may in turn decrease the number of interventions and potentially improve long-term survival.

Current status of endovascular aneurysm repair: 20 years of learning.

Parodi first introduced endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in 1991 and since that time it has been shown to have a lower 30-day morbididty and mortality compared to open surgery. Anatomic constraints governed by the need for adequate access vessels, and sufficient proximal and distal landing zones, as well as the need for long-term surveillance, have been the main limitations of this technology. Anatomic factors were initially estimated to exclude 40% of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The rapid extension of EVAR technology has been complimented by improved access to both high-quality imaging modalities and a variety of endografts. These developments have led EVAR to become a more practical alternative for patients with ruptured AAA. Early data in this setting is encouraging with even more profound reductions in morbidity and mortality than seen in the elective repair.

Arteriopathy in the high-performance athlete.

Pain occurs frequently in high-performance athletes and is most often due to musculoskeletal injury or strain. However, athletes who participate in sports that require highly frequent, repetitive limb motion can also experience pain from an underlying arteriopathy, which causes exercise-induced ischemia. We reviewed the clinical records and follow-up care of 3 high-performance athletes (mean age, 29.3 yr; range, 16-47 yr) who were admitted consecutively to our institution from January 2002 through May 2003, each with a diagnosis of limb ischemia due to arteriopathy. The study group comprised 3 males: 2 active in competitive baseball (ages, 16 and 19 yr) and a cyclist (age, 47 yr). Provocative testing and radiologic evaluation established the diagnoses. Treatment goals included targeted resection of compressive structures, arterial reconstruction to eliminate stenosis and possible emboli, and improvement of distal perfusion. Our successful reconstructive techniques included thoracic outlet decompression and interpositional bypass of the subclavian artery in the 16-year-old patient, pectoralis muscle and tendon decompression to relieve compression of the axillary artery in the 19-year-old, and patch angioplasty for endofibrosis affecting the external iliac artery in the 47-year-old. Each patient was asymptomatic on follow-up and had resumed participation in competitive athletics. The recognition and anatomic definition of an arteriopathy that produces exercise-induced ischemia enables the application of precise therapy that can produce a symptom-free outcome and the ability to resume competitive athletics.

Right colon, sigmoid colon, and transverse colon diverticulitis in the same patient: report of a case.

Although sigmoid colon diverticulitis is frequently seen, right colon and transverse colon diverticulitis remain rare forms of the disease. This case report examined the disease course of a 46-year-old female who first presented to our institution in 1990 with perforated right-sided diverticulitis. During the next 11 years, she developed sigmoid colon diverticulitis and then transverse colon diverticulitis. The right and sigmoid colon diverticulitis were treated with surgery and the transverse colon diverticulitis was managed conservatively. This is the first reported case of a single patient who had separate episodes of diverticulitis in the right, transverse, and sigmoid colon. The evaluation and management of this patient has mirrored a trend in the literature and clinical practice.